Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snapshot API as "Version 1" CR #31

Closed
toji opened this issue Aug 23, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Snapshot API as "Version 1" CR #31

toji opened this issue Aug 23, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@toji
Copy link
Member

toji commented Aug 23, 2016

As brought up in #30, we should probably snapshot the API as it exists today to be cleaned up and submitted for ratification. Khronos has done this with the WebGL API in the past by simply branching the repo and maintaining that as the 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 etc snapshots going forward. When needed changes that are beneficial to all versions get merged back into those branches, but the overall structure of the APIs and conformance tests stay largely static.

Snapshotting the API will allow the master branch to continue evolving to include suggestions like #19, #25, and #30 without worrying about how they might impact near-term spec ratification.

@LJWatson
Copy link

This seems like a good thing to do.

The rough steps would be to publish an updated WD based on the current ED. With that we can post a CFC to the WG to progress the spec to CR.

Looking ahead to CR exit, we will need an implementation report that documents the implementations for each feature in the spc. Do we have tests for the features?

Pinging @siusin as team contact for Gamepad.

@luser
Copy link
Contributor

luser commented Aug 23, 2016

We have a few tests, they're not comprehensive:
http://w3c-test.org/gamepad/

We still need a few things clarified in the spec to usefully progress it to CR, unfortunately I just have never found the time to do them: definitely #8, and I would really like to have #12 or something like it to deal with the vagueness of the current id attribute.

@luser
Copy link
Contributor

luser commented Aug 23, 2016

@siusin
Copy link
Contributor

siusin commented Aug 24, 2016

+1
Happy to help with testing and the publications :)

@beidson
Copy link

beidson commented Aug 24, 2016

+1

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Member

Closing as we are reworking the spec. We will aim to publish a CR sometime next year.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants