-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move "created" and "updated" from Core Properties to DID document metadata #365
Conversation
bb2189d
to
6ae6c65
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor nits, otherwise LGTM.
index.html
Outdated
|
||
<pre class="example" title="JSON-encoded DID document metadata example"> | ||
{ | ||
"created": "2002-10-10T17:00:00Z", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm wondering if we should use a date that is within the range of when the DID spec existed. So, perhaps using created dates after 2018 and update dates after 2020 would be more realistic? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated the example dates in 6663b38.
Merge conflicts need to be resolved. |
Co-authored-by: Manu Sporny <[email protected]>
2609723
to
6663b38
Compare
@msporny thanks, merge conflicts should be fixed now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I approve of moving these properties to the metadata. However, this PR does not address issue #174 - as it does not specify the semantics of these values.
Thanks @selfissued, the PR says the following:
I think "timestamp of the last Update operation" should be sufficient as a definition. My idea is that if additional explanations are needed, then those should be added to the section about the Update operation, not to the metadata property. |
Mostly editorial, multiple positive reviews, changes requested and made, merging. |
Those properties were moved from core properties to metadata in w3c#365.
Those properties were moved from core properties to DID document metadata in w3c#365.
Those properties were moved from core properties to DID document metadata in w3c/did-core#365.
Addresses #203 and #174.
Preview | Diff