You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As discussed in w3c/aria#1309 (comment), UIA doesn't have a mapping for readonly checkboxes, even though aria-readonly is allowed on checkboxes. Readonly semantics end up being exposed through the AriaProperties property instead. Should the AAM be updated to call this out in the aria-readonly table? It seems like that is done for cases like aria-sort.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for only replying to this one as well, a year later! This is also a reasonable and useful change. Let me know if you would like to open a PR with the change, otherwise I'll put it on my to dos.
As discussed in w3c/aria#1309 (comment), UIA doesn't have a mapping for readonly checkboxes, even though
aria-readonly
is allowed on checkboxes. Readonly semantics end up being exposed through theAriaProperties
property instead. Should the AAM be updated to call this out in thearia-readonly
table? It seems like that is done for cases likearia-sort
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: