-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 312
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Virtual Call: pattern matching scopes #1535
Comments
I'm happy to attend. I can't do the 16th. Timezone: BST. |
Same. Timezone: Berlin. |
I'm interested in attending. Timezone is PST. September 18 and 25 are not ideal but could make it work. |
Happy to join, CET timezone. Doodle sounds good. |
While we could do it during TPAC week, I'd prefer to have an hour or so separate from other TPAC discussion. Scheduling as its own meeting seems easiest to me, but will defer if the group wants to create a giant meeting and then sub-schedule under that. |
I would like to attend, ET Timezone, I don't have any prior restraints on the doodle. |
My preference would be to have multiple smaller focused meetings. The scheduling is going to be bad for some, so it'd be good to spread that out a bit, and avoid keeping people awake hours past bedtime. |
Could you invite me as an optional? |
I'm going to put together the doodle tomorrow. Just FYI in case there are folks who are interested, but not posted yet. |
Here is the doodle poll. I thought we could try for the week before TPAC WG meetings to try to reduce scheduling conflicts. https://doodle.com/poll/272trzquxk2fed8w Please let me know if you would like me to shift it later/earlier in the day. I tried to pick something that looked good for the timezones listed here. |
Based on previous posts, still looking for feedback on the doodle from: @jakearchibald @annevk @youennf @makotoshimazu |
I sent out a meeting invite for Friday Oct 9, 10am EDT. |
Works for me, sorry for not responding. |
No problem. I can look at your calendar. :-) |
Sorry for bothering you. I think I can join, thanks! |
No bother at all. Sorry I missed that you hadn't responded to the doodle yet. |
FYI, I plan to use google meet for this video call. The link is in the calendar invite sent to folks already and I will post it in the top comment of this issue just before the meeting tomorrow. |
I've updated the top comment here with the meeting link, minutes doc, and slides. |
Thanks again for taking this on @wanderview! It seems folks interested in next steps here can read on over at as well as OP. |
Just to follow-up here I have filed the following issues based on the discussion:
Please let me know if I missed something. Thank you everyone for participating and providing feedback. I'll be focusing on prototyping and spec'ing the pattern primitive next. |
All, I'd like to do a video call to discuss my latest proposal for service worker pattern matching scopes:
#1468 (comment)
One major change is that URLPattern syntax is proposed to align with path-to-regexp.
I'd also like to discuss the service worker registration id issue as well since its related:
#1512
We could do this during the TPAC week (Oct 12 - 16?) or we could just have a meeting whenever its convenient for folks. I think the first step would be to get a sense of who is interested in attending. I'm hoping to at least get @jakearchibald @asutherland @youennf and @annevk. Also, FYI @blakeembrey as the author of path-to-regexp.
If you are interested in attending please post below with your timezone and any general calendar restrictions (holiday, etc). I'll then make a doodle with some proposed timeslots for folks to vote on.
Thanks!
Date: Friday October 9, 2020
Time: 2pm UTC
Meeting Link: https://meet.google.com/wxc-hfij-pai
Minutes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17FBYuYSBKkYrBnCfj8FQh_gwNPZEhRAqxrjCgXcEkGA/edit?usp=sharing
Slides: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1RFqSfIVGiW40BWt09unVMSThBc3vMwNF7b6XFEsFXSY/edit?usp=sharing
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: