Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Potential work item] DID methods in EDU use cases #5

Open
kimdhamilton opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

[Potential work item] DID methods in EDU use cases #5

kimdhamilton opened this issue Nov 10, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
meeting topic review next Review next meeting

Comments

@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

From Nov 9 2020 meeting:

  • Recommendations for how DIDs can be used in EDU use cases
    • issuer vs recipient dids
  • did methods -- which are useful where
@peacekeeper
Copy link
Member

Just in case people are not aware, last week at the DID WG Virtual F2F meeting, @dhh1128 presented new work on the DID Rubric document that introduces new criteria for evaluating DID methods in the areas of "security" and "privacy" in addition to "decentralization".

See w3c/did-rubric#10

@kimdhamilton kimdhamilton changed the title [Potential work item]: DID methods in EDU use cases [Potential work item] DID methods in EDU use cases Nov 12, 2020
@kimdhamilton kimdhamilton added the review next Review next meeting label Nov 16, 2020
@kayaelle
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated DCC link for identity design decisions:

https://github.com/digitalcredentials/docs/blob/main/identity/design_decisions_id.md

Summary:

  • initial implementation using did:key for learners & did:web for issuers
  • based on the DID rubric mentioned in above comment

How would the task force suggest we take this from here? Is further evaluation needed? Other DID recommendations and why?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
meeting topic review next Review next meeting
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants