Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Links to implementations #20

Open
OR13 opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 6 comments
Open

Links to implementations #20

OR13 opened this issue Oct 16, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor

OR13 commented Oct 16, 2020

I think we should add a section for links to implementations, including:

JS https://github.com/digitalbazaar/did-method-key-js
TS https://github.com/transmute-industries/did-key.js
C# https://github.com/trinsic-id/ld-proofs-dotnet/tree/x25519/Library/W3C.CCG.DidKey

@dmitrizagidulin
Copy link
Collaborator

+1, good idea.

@oed
Copy link

oed commented Nov 18, 2020

We have a few implementations which uses EIP2844:

https://github.com/ceramicnetwork/js-ceramic (@ceramicnetwork/key-did-resolver, use together with did-resolver)
https://github.com/ceramicnetwork/key-did-provider-ed25519
https://github.com/ceramicnetwork/key-did-provider-secp256k1

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Nov 18, 2020

@oed these look awesome! Looking at the tests for them, I am wondering what kind of conformance you have for the did document formats.

Do you support base58 or jwk?

@oed
Copy link

oed commented Nov 18, 2020

Just to clarify, the key-did-provider-* just do the user interaction parts. The key-did-resolver does DID -> DID Doc resolution. Currently it's using base58 which the did-jwt library supports.

Also these "did-providers" are designed to be used with the js-did library.

@OR13
Copy link
Contributor Author

OR13 commented Sep 23, 2021

Can someone do a PR so we can close this issue?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants