Using the decorator on a class with a static file

[eddow]

When declaring a static function in the class being decorated by Component a typescript error (might) occur.
The problem and the solution are here : microsoft/TypeScript#23704

Note: The problem occurs on some computers and not others, it must depend on some global stuff. Though, the static function is available even after going through the Component decorator as it is working on some installations.

[ktsn]

Well, I'm afraid I'm still not sure what your point is.

What is actual code occurring your issue? Please provide a minimal and self-contained reproduction.
Why do you think it is a vue-class-component issue?

[eddow]

Well, it is tough for me to do so because that bug does not occur on my system :">
Though, to give you something minimal to reproduce :

@Component
class myControl extends Vue {
    static someMethod(blah) { ... }
}

The error occuring is exactly the one described in he link I gave;
If I apply the example given in the issue/solution link I gave, this would change the declaration of componentFactory like this :

export function componentFactory<T extends VueClass<Vue>> (
  Component: T,
  options: ComponentOptions<Vue> = {}
): T {

Of course, the signature of the Component decorator would change along

[ktsn]

Hmm, we cannot do anything without proper reproduction...
Could you boil down the problem to clarify what the root cause is?

The error occuring

What the error message, by the way?

[eddow]

This is what has been given to me :

I tried to make a reproduction in https://github.com/eddow/eddow-bug-expo in the branch vcc+static - unfortunately, as I told you, it compiles just fine for me. (I did add some more complexity like I have in my project just to make it more likely to reproduce)

[ktsn]

This is probably the same problem with #294. Please upgrade Vue to v2.5.20.

[eddow]

Well, because of the unreproductible(?) nature of the problem, I think about nothing but to close the bug - I personally dodged the question by removing the static function from my library so it's indeed not really a problem even for me.

Just passin' by - sorry to have bothered.