You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To my mind, the trackers should be penalized if they need longer than one frame duration. In the current implementation it is tolerated that the processing of one frame can take longer than one frame duration as long as not more than twice the frame duration. Is this correct (see code line below)?
Maybe the if statement "self._time > self._interval:" should be changed to "self._time > 0:", or is the tolerance for over one frame desired? I did not found any information about that.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Real-time stuff is very tricky to measure. There are so many things that have to be taken into account. As far as I have tested the configuration it is approximately right, we created some dummy trackers with a fixed sleep interval and see what are the results.
The main focus of the experiment at the moment is to provide some time-related penalties, but we will also consider your remark in the future version of the code.
To my mind, the trackers should be penalized if they need longer than one frame duration. In the current implementation it is tolerated that the processing of one frame can take longer than one frame duration as long as not more than twice the frame duration. Is this correct (see code line below)?
https://github.com/votchallenge/vot-toolkit-python/blob/b23463652bfaba2393079b3517c4bc8bae3e1de8/vot/tracker/__init__.py#L250
Maybe the if statement "self._time > self._interval:" should be changed to "self._time > 0:", or is the tolerance for over one frame desired? I did not found any information about that.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: