-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 92
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document the different debug levels #68
Comments
vmware/vic#709 is in GA release. |
When implemented, will require an update to the existing section on |
vmware/vic#709 is implemented in PRs vmware/vic#1216 and vmware/vic#1217. |
According to Faiyaz, vmware/vic#1216 is internal. |
According to @hickeng in https://communities.vmware.com/message/2626719#2626719, setting debug to 3 suppresses the restart of failed components. We need to find out and document the exact effect of setting debug to 1, 2, 3 ... n. Currently we just talk about setting debug to a value >1. |
Not required for 0.7, so moving back to backlog. |
In vmware/vic#3081 (comment) @hickeng says that debug >2 automatically enables SSH. @hickeng are these debug levels spec'd anywhere? |
Added more info to https://github.com/stuclem/vic/blob/master/doc/user_doc/vic_installation/vch_installer_options.md#--debug: "For example, setting @hickeng do you have more info about what each logging level does? I have a snippet for 2 and 3, but what about 4, 5, ... n? How high can n be? |
Nice to have for 1.1, but might not make the cut. |
Still no info about this. Moving out of 1.1. |
@stuclem Not spec'd as such - I've opened vmware/vic#4575 to do a better job of this. But the basics are: 1: extra verbosity, no changes to behaviour |
Great, thanks @hickeng! |
Added the info from the comment above to the description of the Change is in stuclem@3ab8c2b. @hickeng is this OK? Thanks! |
@stuclem We're going to vet the code where the debug levels are used to confirm current behaviour - what I described was original intent but unverified. I presume you just need current behaviour for this - what level of detail? |
@hickeng yes, we need the behaviour as it is in 1.1. I don't think that we need masses of detail - just enough to let people know why they might need or want to set a level higher than 1, and what impact that will have on their setup. Thanks! |
This change is merged, but leaving this issue open pending the code vetting by @hickeng. |
To be verified in 1.2. |
Given @chengwang86 's comments in #532, I think that it's safe to finally close this one. |
From @stuclem on May 30, 2016 15:14
Per vmware/vic#709.
Copied from original issue: vmware/vic#852
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: