Use buildjet-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 runner instead of macos-latest to …

[bmarty]

…build and run the integration tests.

Draft, to see how the CI will digest this change.

post build result (using 4vcpu runner):

Before	After
(from #7015) 74 minutes	23 minutes

Just for this specific job. I will also remove the second attempt as discussed today, since it looks not very useful.

EDIT
PR content is:

• Use buildjet-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 for integration test and post-pr jobs
• Remove second attempt to run integration tests
• Upload artifacts with the test result: Html report and logcat output are included in the artifacts
• Try to use a cached emulator (not sure that this is working according to the log of the action)

TODO in a separate PR:

• Fix failing tests
• stop trying to export code coverage to sonar if there are failing test. This is maybe the root cause of the 0% coverage reported by sonar

TODO in a separate PR:

• test the other available buildjet runners, to compare performance, and see if it worth paying more.

[bmarty]

We start with this runner and will compare later the perf of other available (but more not with the same price) runners.

[manuroe]

Can we try first with buildjet-2vcpu-ubuntu-2204?
And use beefier machines only if we can prove there are better?

[bmarty]

Yes. 0685fb1

[bmarty]

It seems that with buildjet-2vcpu-ubuntu-2204 we do not have enough RAM. See https://github.com/vector-im/element-android/actions/runs/3080897698/jobs/4980174874 failure.

Can we revert to 4vcpu which got 16 GB of RAM (2x the RAM available on 4vcpu) @manuroe ?

[manuroe]

Ok. Thanks for having tried.

[manuroe]

We need to change the PR title again. Then, it is all good to me 🚀🚀🚀

[fedrunov]

It shows "all checks haves passed", while all-tests has actually failed. Probably because of continue-on-error: true. community/community#15452

[sonarqubecloud]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

0.0% Coverage
0.0% Duplication