Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emoji inconsistencies in composer #4756

Closed
ouchadam opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4758
Closed

Emoji inconsistencies in composer #4756

ouchadam opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4758
Labels
A-Composer O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Tolerable Low/no impact on users T-Defect Something isn't working: bugs, crashes, hangs and other reported problems

Comments

@ouchadam
Copy link
Contributor

Steps to reproduce

  1. Add a new emoji such as 😮‍💨 via the keyboard
  2. Notice the unicode components are displayed
  3. Submitting the message then shows the correct emoji again

Outcome

What did you expect?

The see the correct emoji 😮‍💨

What happened instead?

Got 😮 💨

Screenshot_20211217_094434

Your phone model

Pocofone f1

Operating system version

android 10 (MIUI 12.0.3.0)

Application version and app store

1.3.10

Homeserver

matrix.org

Will you send logs?

No

@ouchadam ouchadam added T-Defect Something isn't working: bugs, crashes, hangs and other reported problems A-Composer S-Tolerable Low/no impact on users O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow labels Dec 17, 2021
@bmarty
Copy link
Member

bmarty commented Dec 30, 2021

Fixed in EA 1.3.13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Composer O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Tolerable Low/no impact on users T-Defect Something isn't working: bugs, crashes, hangs and other reported problems
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants