Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Accuracy on CIFAR10 is around 21% . Is there any thing else to check? #19

Open
dipanjan06 opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Accuracy on CIFAR10 is around 21% . Is there any thing else to check? #19

dipanjan06 opened this issue Jun 24, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@dipanjan06
Copy link

Hi,
I ran the cifar10_2.py code and get acc 21% after 50 epoch . For the data preprocessing I have used code mentioned in https://github.com/vector-1127/DAC/blob/master/Datasets_description/read_data.py. Am I missing anything ? can you please help to reproduce the result mentioned in the paper.
@JiaxinZhuang
Copy link

I also implement a version of DAC with pytorch, but it seems that hard to reproduce the results in cidfar10. MNIST is ok and maybe better than results claimed in paper.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@dipanjan06 @JiaxinZhuang