Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use pnpm manage package these files will not be generated #4695

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2024

Conversation

pzzyf
Copy link
Contributor

@pzzyf pzzyf commented Oct 20, 2024

Description

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • Please, don't make changes to pnpm-lock.yaml unless you introduce a new test example.

Checklist

ℹ️ Check all checkboxes - this will indicate that you have done everything in accordance with the rules in CONTRIBUTING.

  • If you introduce new functionality, document it. You can run documentation with pnpm run docs:dev command.
  • Run the tests with pnpm test.
  • Changes in changelog are generated from PR name. Please, make sure that it explains your changes in an understandable manner. Please, prefix changeset messages with feat:, fix:, perf:, docs:, or chore:.
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Simplified the lock file search process by focusing on pnpm-lock.yaml.
    • Maintained existing functionality for other related functions.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 94a6d54

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifying the findMonorepoRoot function in the internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts file. The update simplifies the lock file search process by limiting it to only pnpm-lock.yaml, whereas previously it searched for multiple lock file names. The function's return value and the structure of related functions remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts Modified findMonorepoRoot to search only for pnpm-lock.yaml, simplifying the search criteria.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

  • vince292007
  • anncwb

Poem

In the garden where rabbits play,
A lock file's search has found its way.
With pnpm in sight, oh what a delight,
Simplified paths make our work light!
Hops of joy in the code we lay,
For every change, a brighter day! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts (1)

Remove references to other package managers to enforce pnpm-only setup.

The following files still reference other package managers, which should be updated or removed to maintain a pnpm-only environment:

  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Specifies engines support for yarn.
  • internal/lint-configs/eslint-config/src/configs/ignores.ts: Contains '**/yarn.lock'.
  • docs/src/en/guide/essentials/development.md: References to yarn.lock in multiple sections.
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 22-50: Verify behavior of dependent functions with pnpm-only setup.

While the changes to findMonorepoRoot don't directly modify the logic of other functions in this file, it's important to ensure that getPackagesSync, getPackages, and getPackage still behave as expected with the new pnpm-only setup.

Please run the following script to verify the behavior of these functions:

This script will test each function and output the results. Please review the output to ensure that all functions are working correctly with the new pnpm-only setup.


[/run_scripts]

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the behavior of monorepo utility functions with pnpm-only setup

# Test: Check if the functions can be imported and executed without errors
cat << EOF > test_monorepo_utils.js
const { findMonorepoRoot, getPackagesSync, getPackages, getPackage } = require('./internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts');

async function testMonorepoUtils() {
  console.log('Testing findMonorepoRoot:');
  console.log(findMonorepoRoot());

  console.log('\nTesting getPackagesSync:');
  console.log(getPackagesSync());

  console.log('\nTesting getPackages:');
  const packages = await getPackages();
  console.log(packages);

  if (packages.packages.length > 0) {
    const firstPackageName = packages.packages[0].packageJson.name;
    console.log('\nTesting getPackage with:', firstPackageName);
    const singlePackage = await getPackage(firstPackageName);
    console.log(singlePackage);
  }
}

testMonorepoUtils().catch(console.error);
EOF

node test_monorepo_utils.js

# Clean up
rm test_monorepo_utils.js

echo "Verification complete. Please review the output to ensure all functions are working as expected with the pnpm-only setup."

Length of output: 459


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Static analysis to ensure pnpm-only setup by checking for other package managers

echo "Searching for references to other package managers (npm, yarn) in the codebase..."

# Search for 'npm' references excluding 'pnpm'
rg --ignore-case --word-regexp 'npm(?!pnpm)' .

# Search for 'yarn' references
rg --ignore-case --word-regexp 'yarn' .

echo "Search complete. Please review the above results to ensure there are no unintended references to other package managers."

Length of output: 1357

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 860fc15 and 94a6d54.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
internal/node-utils/src/monorepo.ts (1)

14-17: Update function documentation to reflect pnpm-only support.

The change to search only for 'pnpm-lock.yaml' aligns with the PR objective of using pnpm for package management. However, the function's documentation should be updated to reflect this change.

Consider updating the function's documentation as follows:

 /**
- * 查找大仓的根目录
+ * 查找使用 pnpm 的大仓根目录
  * @param cwd
  */

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the project, please run the following script:

This script will help identify any remaining references to npm or yarn in the project, which may need to be updated to use pnpm.

@anncwb anncwb added the chore label Oct 20, 2024
@anncwb anncwb changed the title fix: use pnpm manage package these files will not be generated chore: use pnpm manage package these files will not be generated Oct 20, 2024
@anncwb anncwb merged commit 93b48ef into vbenjs:main Oct 20, 2024
15 checks passed
@pzzyf pzzyf deleted the fix/utils branch October 20, 2024 14:30
GavinLucky pushed a commit to GavinLucky/vue-vben-admin that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 2, 2024
16 tasks
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants