-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Statistical methods employed comparing insulation scores #190
Comments
Hey, apologies for the late response. Here is some pseudocode for
As you can see, You can see the actual code here: fanc/fanc/commands/fanc_commands.py Lines 3533 to 3548 in d5d8608
So, the call would be DifferenceRegions.from_regions(
matrix1, matrix2,
file_name=comparison_output,
tmpdir=tmp,
mode='w',
log=log
) All fanc/fanc/architecture/comparisons.py Lines 532 to 540 in d5d8608
|
I'm comparing insulation scores of two samples using FANC. I've created two .bed files—one through FANC compare and the other via fanc.DifferenceRegions.from_regions, both using a 50kb bin and a 150kb window. However, I've observed discrepancies between the outputs of these bed files, leaving me unsure of which one to utilize.
My main questions revolve around the statistical methods employed in generating these outputs. Specifically, I want to know what statistical analyses underlie the calculations used to generate these outputs and what the criteria are for determining the significance of differences between the insulation scores of the two samples.
Thanks,
Luz P
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: