Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OBSOLETE] fields, subfields, character positions #339

Closed
CECSpecialistI opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

[OBSOLETE] fields, subfields, character positions #339

CECSpecialistI opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
MARC21 Questions and discussions specifically about the MARC21 format obsolete or deprecated involves obsolete MARC tags or deprecated RDA properties
Milestone

Comments

@CECSpecialistI
Copy link
Collaborator

We decided on 2022-04-13 that we should map obsolete fields/subfields/character positions if they are present in OCLC database. To find out which are used and which are not, Junghae will assemble a list from everything marked [obsolete] in the spreadsheets, and send to OCLC for review. Busy this week, likely sometime next week. Thank you @junghaelee for tackling this one!!

@CECSpecialistI CECSpecialistI added MARC21 Questions and discussions specifically about the MARC21 format obsolete or deprecated involves obsolete MARC tags or deprecated RDA properties labels Apr 13, 2022
@CECSpecialistI CECSpecialistI added this to the PCC RDA BSR milestone Apr 13, 2022
@CECSpecialistI
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@junghaelee identified the following problems with the 00x spreadsheet:

  • Instances of the same field/subfield combinations recurring with different labels
  • Erroneous [OBSOLETE] labels throughout (could be a more widespread problem we haven't caught?)
  • Resource types/material types absent for character positions when values depend on them, need to have them populated (MCM had idea of another column...that could work. could also (preferably) use a condition column)
  • Some values have labels but are missing character positions

@mcm104 will follow up on these (thank you!)

@SitaKB is this what you were asking about/related to the problems you were asking about in #50 ?

@SitaKB
Copy link
Collaborator

SitaKB commented Apr 29, 2022

@CECSpecialistI Yes, these are the issues I encounter in the 00x spreadsheet.
In 008 file there are also values which are not present in the 008 MARC21 list. I think that those values are from 007.

@CECSpecialistI
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @SitaKB !

@CECSpecialistI
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OCLC's Response:
Hi Junghae,

Thank you for contacting OCLC Customer Support. I checked with my colleague regarding your question. We cannot provide a list of obsolete fields/values which still have data in bib records. However you could get this information by running a normal "li:" query using a query collection and then using MARC edit to pull out each field that is obsolete to see what data is entered there:

https://help.oclc.org/Metadata_Services/WorldShare_Collection_Manager/Query_collections/Create_a_query_collection_to_get_a_spreadsheet_of_your_holdings/Create_a_spreadsheet_of_your_WorldCat_holdings

Please let me know if you have any additional questions,

Best,
Lindsay Kelly
OCLC . Customer Support Specialist

@CECSpecialistI
Copy link
Collaborator Author

CECSpecialistI commented Jun 8, 2022

We will need to check on whether obsolete fields/subfields/character positions are being used in source data ourselves. Since they are obsolete, we will not prioritize this work right now, and will put off mapping obsolete fields/subfields/character positions until at least the end of the PCC RDA BSR/CSR milestones. Decision

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
MARC21 Questions and discussions specifically about the MARC21 format obsolete or deprecated involves obsolete MARC tags or deprecated RDA properties
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants