-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release artifacts for v0.0.24 and v0.0.25 are missing #5929
Comments
See also: #5915 @cakebaker seems to just have triggered a rerun of the actions. Hopefully that'll fix it. |
I found something: the variable This is the case since the CICD workflow was never triggered on the release tag. I think I found the root cause: since 4d2bdf4, workflows are only triggered on commit pushes to main (not tags). |
Do you think it is possible to either fix the release artifacts for v0.0.24 manually or do a new release soon? |
We're about halfway until the next release, so I don't see a particular rush to fix this at the moment. Do you really need them in addition to all the other installation methods? |
With #5694 (which is in 0.0.24), I was trying to get a larger set of statically linked release artifacts. I need this for another PR in another repo which depends on those binary artifacts: bazel-contrib/bazel-lib#706 But I also totally understand if you prefer to just wait until the next release. |
v0.0.25 and the artifacts are still missing |
yeah, dunno why :( |
This time it was an issue with the cargo.lock file, as can be seen here: https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/8404507913 I think this issue was resolved with the next commit on main: 68c77b4 |
I have been trying to do a 0.0.26 for artifact but some Windows systems have been failing. I am waiting for them to be fixed upstream (github) |
Is it possible to attach the binaries to the previous 0.0.24 and 0.0.25 releases? Would be useful for not searching through CICD random commit builds :) |
I'd rather focus on fixing it. Artifacts generated by GH actions are always better than something uploaded manually so you at least get a bit of assurance that it's correct (especially considering the recent news around security issues in release tarballs :) ) |
I agree, but once the build action is fixed, these 2 releases will not be updated automatically right? |
They probably won't be regenerated. We start try to restart the tasks but not idea if it will work or not |
I took a step to hopefully fix this: #6181 I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't generate artifacts for the old releases. uutils is too unstable to be concerned with that in my opinion. We'll experiment with fixing this with pre-releases for 0.0.26 instead of making a real release right away, so that we won't have more proper releases without artifacts. Once it works, we release 0.0.26 and everybody can be happy again. |
I believe that #6270 will fix the issue. Ping me when the next release is on deck and I'll be happy to help debug any issues. |
It looks like something went wrong here: https://github.com/uutils/coreutils/actions/runs/7596318857
EDIT: I'm seeing this error between a mountain of weird output:
Pipeline is green now but release artifacts are still missing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: