Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tied parameters in external parameter data section #153

Closed
BJEANNOT0 opened this issue Dec 14, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Tied parameters in external parameter data section #153

BJEANNOT0 opened this issue Dec 14, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@BJEANNOT0
Copy link

Hello,

i do not manage to enter tied parameters in an external parameter data section.
I made an external file specifically for tied parameters and I added a column named "partied" in the file referencing tied parameters, but I keep getting this error :
error condition prevents further execution : map :: at

Do you know what the problem might be ?
I send as an attachment an external parameter data section

por_m_tied.txt

Thanks for your help.
Best regards,

@jtwhite79
Copy link
Collaborator

Can you post to full pest control file and external sections? That parameter data section you posted only has one parameter listed...

@BJEANNOT0
Copy link
Author

THanks for your quick answer.
Here is the whole set of files :
pcf.txt

model_input.txt
model_output.txt
per_m.txt
por_f.txt
por_m.txt
por_m_tied.txt
emm_f.txt
emm_m.txt
flux_depression.txt
per_f.txt
per_l.txt
O_f_piez_FP007.txt

I can tell you that when I replace the file por_m_tied.txt by the file below, Pest++ runs without error
por_m_tied_nottied.txt

@jtwhite79
Copy link
Collaborator

got it - there is a bug in how using the "easy" names interacts with the identification and checking of tied parameters. testing a fix right now, should have a new pre-release soon....

@BJEANNOT0
Copy link
Author

Thank you ! I switched to "old" names and it worked.

@jtwhite79
Copy link
Collaborator

This should be fixed as of 5.1.9. Feel free to reopen this issue if not.

@BJEANNOT0
Copy link
Author

BJEANNOT0 commented Dec 22, 2021

Thank you !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants