-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and Post-Link Optimization (PLO) on ctags #3849
Comments
Thank you for this input. |
I tried using the Linux kernel as input. With PGO, it is about 10% faster.
After polishing, I will make a pull request for this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi!
Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are available here. I also have several examples of applying PGO to the software like
ctags
:That's why I think trying to optimize ctags with PGO can be a good idea.
I can suggest the following action points:
Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.
Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:
configure
scriptThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: