-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Regularization, Feature Importance for back-to-back regression #74
Comments
have a look at #42 for regularization/CV - I can make b2b much faster, but I haven't found the time yet... |
I'm mostly trying out things. I dislike writing native solutions from scratch because I typically don't have the time to test them through & typically I can't optimize them as much. But clearly, there are too many dependencies, i.e. one library to do the job should be enough ;-) For me B2B is still very much in research-domain, e.g. I applied it to P300 RT data but it "didnt work", i.e. didnt take RT into account even though univariatly it does. #42 is still in progress |
btw. very welcome to modify my PR I think you asked for the P3 data somewhere, sorry I forgot. This is a modified version of your DataAnalysis.jl notebook from the FaPra The p3 data you can find here (careful 700mb): https://cloud.wirdreibei.de/s/i3r2xT9Ep9SC9P9 I didn't double check it, running a bit out of time to do everything I want. If you have trouble just mention it here |
I think it would be useful to have an option of adding regularization to the current back-to-back regression solver. Additionally, if following could be implemented -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: