-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Basic ajax/API style support for headless approaches #730
Comments
I concur. Would save us great pains if implemented. |
This sounds like a super upgrade, we've already had similar issues in our earlier project. |
We would save a lot of time with this support in our current project. |
Yes please! |
definitely, our team could benefit from this as well! |
Nice feature! |
We've added this feature which will be part of 10.2. If anyone interested wants to take a look to see some details and perhaps feedback any thoughts before we make this available in the release candidate, there's a page in this documentation PR - |
Much rejoicing!! |
It would be useful to have decent support for using Umbraco Forms in a headless scenario of using Umbraco CMS.
Both supported by code via services for example, and by documentation. This should at least cover the following:
Currently without this support you are forced to jump through many hoops trying to imitate what Umbraco Forms does behind the curtains and even then you end up in questionable technical debt with the risk of future updates to Umbraco Forms invalidating your current approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: