You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Good idea. Please note that the temperature is represented by several different variable names: tftmp Peak helium coolant temperature in TF coils and PF coils (K) tmpcry Temperature of cryogenic components (K) thelium Helium temperature at peak field (= superconductor temperature) (K)
Note also that the superconductor critical surface functions are not always valid over the full range of possible temperatures.
Two of these are inputs, and tftmp already goes up to 40 K. It certainly won't do any harm to raise the upper limit for tmpcry, but I have no idea if it will do anything at all.
case ('tftmp')
call parse_real_variable('tftmp', tftmp, 0.01D0, 40.0D0, &
'Peak TF coil He coolant temp. (K)')
case ('tmpcry')
call parse_real_variable('tmpcry', tmpcry, 0.01D0, 10.0D0, &
'Cryogenic temperature (K)')
In GitLab by @pc6783 on Nov 15, 2021, 18:04
Hey folks:
tmpcry is currently capped at 10 K. For HTS this could be much higher, with typical ranges sometimes exceeding 40 K. Let's relax this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: