Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UFS documentation #1186

Open
junwang-noaa opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

UFS documentation #1186

junwang-noaa opened this issue Apr 20, 2022 · 5 comments

Comments

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@DeniseWorthen DeniseWorthen linked a pull request Apr 27, 2022 that will close this issue
16 tasks
@gspetro-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@junwang-noaa Can a ufs-v3.0.0 version of the readthedocs site be created in time for the SRW App release? I see that there is a release/public-v3 branch in the GitHub repo but no corresponding RTD docs version. It is fairly simply to activate docs for a branch in RTD; I'm happy to explain if needed.

@junwang-noaa
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure. FYI. @jkbk2004 @daniel-hildebrandt are managing the release/public-v3 branch.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

SRW documentation is currently undergoing development.

Not clear what the interaction between EIB and EPIC is on this project.

@gspetro-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@DeniseWorthen @jkbk2004 It turns out that Ligia added me as a maintainer for the WM docs ReadTheDocs (RTD) site a while back. We will likely need someone on the WM side to add a ufs-srw-v2.1.0 tag on the UFS WM repo (corresponding to the WM hash being used in the SRW v2.1.0 release), and then I can go ahead and use that tag to create RTD documentation that pulls the docs from that hash.
As to general WM documentation updates, I have a lot of ideas and have started some documentation improvements, but I haven't been able to work on them this Program Increment because EPIC shifted its focus more to SRW/RRFS and some other contractual requirements coming down the line. I'm hopeful I'll be able to get back to the WM docs, but I don't yet know when.

@DeniseWorthen
Copy link
Collaborator

@gspetro-NOAA Thanks for the update.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants