Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update modulefiles to combine with UFS-WM NOAH-MP subcomponent #4

Closed
jkbk2004 opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #6
Closed

Update modulefiles to combine with UFS-WM NOAH-MP subcomponent #4

jkbk2004 opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #6
Assignees

Comments

@jkbk2004
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Add dual functionality to build UFS-WM -DAPP=ATML application in the ecbuild-based land-DA_workflow cmake system
  • Set UFS-WM as submodule and utilize compile.sh and run_compile.sh scripts
  • Additional build scripts can be added to CMakeLists.txt
  • Depends on unified spack-stack maintenance on RDHPCS and PW-Cloud platforms: need to prioritize hera/orion cases first
  • Follow-up is needed with UFS-WM testing w/ spack-stack ufs-weather-model#1651
@ulmononian
Copy link
Collaborator

ulmononian commented Apr 11, 2023

i created a new ufswm fork branch that utilizes the official spack-stack unified environment in its module files (currently only orion is updated): https://github.com/ulmononian/ufs-weather-model/blob/feature/spack_stack_ue/modulefiles/ufs_orion.intel.lua.

this can be used to test the build of the ufswm -DAPP=ATML component as part of the ecbuild step for an updated land DA worklow CMakeLists.txt.

additionally, i updated the hera and orion land DA modulefiles in my fork of the release branch here: https://github.com/ulmononian/land-offline_workflow/tree/release/public-v1.0.0/modulefiles. these utilize the spack-stack unified-environment with associated new builds of the fv3-bundle w/ this stack. however, the fv3-bundle may need to be rebuilt considering results mentioned in #2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants