-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Low accuracy of LeNet #11
Comments
Hey, @jlwatson. Sry to bother you. But do you have any ideas? |
Hey! I can't immediately run some tests, but as a starting point, could you try running it with That's the actual LeNet architecture we evaluated with, it just doesn't have the last relu layer, which doesn't interact well with our loss function. |
Hey just to follow up, you should use the versions without the last ReLU
layer -- it plays nicer with our loss function. And LeNet is pretty easy to
train, so I'm not very surprised to see high accuracy after only 5 rounds.
Looks like things are working properly.
…On Fri, Apr 7, 2023 at 2:36 AM llCurious ***@***.***> wrote:
I just check the figures on the paper. The presented figure is only about
97% for training 10 epochs. The above figures that I obtain is for 5
epochs. Is there something wrong with this part?
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/21785695/230585340-9c2b1514-730d-4432-a4a6-ca75932d5a23.png>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMIC4622H26EBOFTXHCA7DW77N3TANCNFSM6AAAAAAWVKBAQY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hey. I try to run the experiments for LeNet model. However i noticed that the convergence of LeNet is weird. The test accuracy of LeNet remains low (far from 98%). I only changed the
localhost_config.json
to run locally with the following configurations:files/models/lenet.json
The output is as follows:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: