You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Elision correlation between the - and + sections of a patch is very naive right now. It matches based on positions of the ellipses in the patch, so it can easily get things wrong.
We should consider a more sophisticated elision matching implementation; perhaps by diffing the - and + sections.
Alternatively, or in addition to that, we may want to support named elisions or equivalent for cases where even best-effort elision won't behave correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Elision correlation between the
-
and+
sections of a patch is very naive right now. It matches based on positions of the ellipses in the patch, so it can easily get things wrong.We should consider a more sophisticated elision matching implementation; perhaps by diffing the
-
and+
sections.Alternatively, or in addition to that, we may want to support named elisions or equivalent for cases where even best-effort elision won't behave correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: