Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specifying FRI leads to NetCDF dimension errors in EQ #613

Open
rarutter opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Specifying FRI leads to NetCDF dimension errors in EQ #613

rarutter opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@rarutter
Copy link
Collaborator

rarutter commented Aug 3, 2023

@valeriabriones discovered that when running EQ with FRI, the model frequently produces a netCDF dimension error at the end of the stage.

This is due to the model overwriting the specified EQ year count to ensure that it has time to recover post fire before changing stages. If the new year count is greater than the length of the time dimension in the output files, it will produce the dimension error.

@valeriabriones
Copy link
Collaborator

@rarutter Thank you! Yes it was a misinterpretation on my part of the length of eq years to FRI. Its a value evenly divisible by FRI and then subtract two from that value. Whereas I read it as set eq years to a value evenly divisible by FRI-2. Currently been test running and seems to work without errors, will run more substantial runs.

@rarutter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rarutter commented Aug 4, 2023

Oh good, so you can at least run your test scenarios. I still need to address the automatic recalculation/file size, but at least I'm not holding you up!

@rarutter
Copy link
Collaborator Author

rarutter commented Sep 6, 2023

Hey @valeriabriones I'm going to go ahead and keep this one open until I fix how the model includes FRI. It's become a more troublesome fix than I'd anticipated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants