We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ScalaCheck provides a small DSL for writing properties, consisting of syntax like:
p1 ==> p2
&&
||
==
all
atLeastOne
p :| "label"
Which of these should we support? All, none, some?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just wanted ==> and :| whilst trying to eliminate some unsafeRunSync().
==>
:|
unsafeRunSync()
Sorry, something went wrong.
I would like to use these with scalacheck-effect as well @rossabaker would you mind if I make a PR here porting over Banno/vault4s#225?
No branches or pull requests
ScalaCheck provides a small DSL for writing properties, consisting of syntax like:
p1 ==> p2
)&&
,||
,==
,all
,atLeastOne
)p :| "label"
)Which of these should we support? All, none, some?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: