You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If you have a card with only a 40Gb interface on it this is false. This may be the correct thing to do but would anyone oppose to adding a "Has 40Gb interface" tag to assets?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@michaeljs1990 I think we should support arbitrary (read: dynamic nic classifications). I think it would be sweet to auto-infer classification, and do some rounding to make things look right, so a nic reporting 999999kbps in LSHW is reported as a 10g nic, and perhaps even expose interface (ethernet/IB) as well. Thoughts?
I think this will be more extensible if instead of relying on booleans (has 10g/has 40g, which gets confusing when 40g is a superset of 10g for some requirements), we should rely on numerics (i.e. at least 10g capacity, at least 40g capacity)
If you have a card with only a 40Gb interface on it this is false. This may be the correct thing to do but would anyone oppose to adding a "Has 40Gb interface" tag to assets?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: