chore: lint and doc cleanup

[nyurik]

A few more minor cleanups, mostly in documentation

[joshka]

I notice a bunch of checks are failing on this.

It looks like this change effectively ignores a bunch of places that could be better written. I wonder if it would be worth leaving the lints for those on rather than ignoring them, with a goal to fix the issues rather than ignore them.

[nyurik]

I notice a bunch of checks are failing on this.

It looks like this change effectively ignores a bunch of places that could be better written. I wonder if it would be worth leaving the lints for those on rather than ignoring them, with a goal to fix the issues rather than ignore them.

ok, makes sense, i removed the clippy changes for now

[mindoodoo]

Wasn't exactly sure for the conventional commit (PR title) as this is both linting and a couple doc fixes so marked it as unscoped chore, maintainers feel free to change it to something more adequate if you have any ideas.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #191 (808dfc5) into main (77067bd) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 66.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #191      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.63%   81.66%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          34       34              
  Lines        6574     6572       -2     
==========================================
  Hits         5367     5367              
+ Misses       1207     1205       -2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/backend/mod.rs	33.33% <0.00%> (+4.76%)	⬆️
src/buffer.rs	92.81% <ø> (ø)
src/terminal.rs	55.64% <ø> (ø)
src/layout.rs	85.25% <100.00%> (ø)
src/widgets/reflow.rs	98.80% <100.00%> (ø)

[joshka]

Wasn't exactly sure for the conventional commit (PR title) as this is both linting and a couple doc fixes so marked it as unscoped chore, maintainers feel free to change it to something more adequate if you have any ideas.

chore is fine. I made the changes that we both suggested (just used _n instead of a lint exception)

[nyurik]

@joshka were the Cargo.toml changes intentional?

[nyurik]

Ah, I see - you moved the indoc into dependencies because of the format usage, plus sorted them. Slightly outside of the initial scope, but sure, not a biggie :)

I removed the no-longer-needed comment about the underscore, and rebased on main

changed to _n