-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Second try: large table mods merged against current treilly master #3
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…s to apples comparison with sharded databases
These addition commits pull in all the latest changes from the treilly ycsb repo, and propagate the int->long conversion up to the Client operation and record count parameters. |
I can't merge this pull request b/c there are conflicts. |
I don't get it - I don't see any conflicts and I'm not sure how to merge Pull/push shows no conflicts - if you didn't make any changes to master, On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:14 AM, treilly-nuodb [email protected]:
David Hentchel Performance Engineer (617) 803 - 1193 |
Not sure where this is standing right now. I'm happy to re-create my fork My current fork 'seems' to be up to date, not sure why it wouldn't show commit 9fd0bb0
commit bf0fcf0
commit ed0dfc6
to apples comparison with sharded databases commit b89e978
commit 94b7343
commit cbe4d37
commit 5262070
commit d15d693
commit 9344668 dave On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David Hentchel [email protected] wrote:
David Hentchel Performance Engineer (617) 803 - 1193 |
Create a new repo, made your repo an upstream, fetched, merged, committed and pushed.
This should be the one.
d.