You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
first of all, thanks you for developing this method. It seems quite useful so far. However, I'm having some troubles interpreting the results.
I went through your toy example with 10 features (e.g. OTUs) observed in 15 samples. In the example you decided to cut the data into three bins to get three amalgams. This is nicely illustrated in the paper as well.
Is there a way to estimate the contribution of each OTU on the amalgams? Is this stored in out$amalgams (when following your code)? And is it possible to translate this matrix directly into the contribution of each OTU to the amalgams?
Sorry for my questions but I would like to use the method on some real data and would like to interpret the results in a biological context.
Another question
Many thanks!
Best,
Axel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
first of all, thanks you for developing this method. It seems quite useful so far. However, I'm having some troubles interpreting the results.
I went through your toy example with 10 features (e.g. OTUs) observed in 15 samples. In the example you decided to cut the data into three bins to get three amalgams. This is nicely illustrated in the paper as well.
Is there a way to estimate the contribution of each OTU on the amalgams? Is this stored in out$amalgams (when following your code)? And is it possible to translate this matrix directly into the contribution of each OTU to the amalgams?
Sorry for my questions but I would like to use the method on some real data and would like to interpret the results in a biological context.
Another question
Many thanks!
Best,
Axel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: