You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, thanks for putting together this font, I've been using it for years and I love it! 😃
It would be nice if the font worked a little better with regex. Here are a few types of regex groups:
(?=
(?!
(?<=
(?<!
In FiraCode they are rendered very inconsistently. Some have ligatures, some don't. (?<= is particularly bad since it groups the <= as something semantically unrelated while leaving the ? out to dry. That one throws me off every time I see it. I'm not even asking for more ligatures 😅 but it would be a definite improvement to force those specific sequences to always stay independent. I hope (? is unique enough that it can always be assumed to be part of a regex.
Here is a hopefully complete list (Source). I've only noticed this issue with syntax that starts with (? so those are the only ones I included (and wow, there are way more of them than I thought)
First off, thanks for putting together this font, I've been using it for years and I love it! 😃
It would be nice if the font worked a little better with regex. Here are a few types of regex groups:
In FiraCode they are rendered very inconsistently. Some have ligatures, some don't.
(?<=
is particularly bad since it groups the<=
as something semantically unrelated while leaving the?
out to dry. That one throws me off every time I see it. I'm not even asking for more ligatures 😅 but it would be a definite improvement to force those specific sequences to always stay independent. I hope(?
is unique enough that it can always be assumed to be part of a regex.Here is a hopefully complete list (Source). I've only noticed this issue with syntax that starts with
(?
so those are the only ones I included (and wow, there are way more of them than I thought)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: