You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#BNF notation is often used to indicate syntax descriptions:
<expr> ::= <term>|<expr><addop><term>
We have a nice ligatures for :=, but ::= really is inconsistent in comparison, as the :: ligature visually breaks up ::= into :: and = parts. They should really be like the := ligature, but with the left two dots repeated to form a square, and probably the equals sign part extended a bit more.
This would look better something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#BNF notation is often used to indicate syntax descriptions:
We have a nice ligatures for
:=
, but::=
really is inconsistent in comparison, as the::
ligature visually breaks up::=
into::
and=
parts. They should really be like the:=
ligature, but with the left two dots repeated to form a square, and probably the equals sign part extended a bit more.This would look better something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: