Detect chef provisioners by type instead of by name (multi-machine), fix #101 #103
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@tmatilai, here is my modest attempt at fixing #101 (where chef provisioner detection was broken in multi-machine Vagrantfiles). I have tested by hand that the PR works in both single-machine and multi-machine modes, with the following
Vagrantfile
:In single-machine mode:
In multi-machine mode:
(without the PR, it would return
nil
as the value of the chef no_proxy in the multi-vm case).Feel free to merge, close #101 and enjoy Christmas @tmatilai.