Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define progression path for contributor to maintainer #1117

Closed
waldyrious opened this issue Oct 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Define progression path for contributor to maintainer #1117

waldyrious opened this issue Oct 14, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
community Issues/PRs dealing with role changes and community organization. decision A (possibly breaking) decision regarding tldr-pages content, structure, infrastructure, etc.

Comments

@waldyrious
Copy link
Member

Collecting notes I've put elsewhere:

From #1048 (comment):

[We should] ensure resilience of the project over the long term by making the barriers between user, contributor and maintainer as permeable as possible -- case in point: none of the the currently active maintainers were part of the original team. We want this fluid adaptation to continue into the future.

From #980 (comment):

One thing we clearly need is a way to handle the natural flow of maintainers: people's availability varies over time, so a hand-picked, small maintainer team won't be resilient in the long-run. I suggest something more permeable, inspired in the model used by Wikipedia: after a contributor has, say, 3 PRs merged, they should automatically get commit rights, and after X more commits they should be made part of the tldr-pages organization. If this could be implemented automatically, even better. That way the project is able to scale naturally, and avoid the stagnation that often plagues to such endeavors once the original team loses steam.

@waldyrious waldyrious added the decision A (possibly breaking) decision regarding tldr-pages content, structure, infrastructure, etc. label Oct 22, 2016
@waldyrious
Copy link
Member Author

There are interesting notes in http://docs.brew.sh/#maintainers which we could take some inspiration from. But let's try making the whole thing lighter (i.e. less documents to read, and more automated steps).

@sbrl
Copy link
Member

sbrl commented May 22, 2017

I'd want to field-test the whole thing for a while first in manual-mode - to make sure we get the right balance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
community Issues/PRs dealing with role changes and community organization. decision A (possibly breaking) decision regarding tldr-pages content, structure, infrastructure, etc.
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants