You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This paper extensively uses many abbreviated terms, which makes the paper a bit tricky to read.
I already briefly tried using \pdftooltip{TERM}{Description} from the pdfcomment package, to define terms directly (without going through a glossary), but it behaves a bit strange. Probably pandoc needs some tweaking.
Is this something that people would be interested in? Has anyone else already attempted it?
I would be happy to keep trying, if it makes sense.
This paper extensively uses many abbreviated terms, which makes the paper a bit tricky to read.
I already briefly tried using
\pdftooltip{TERM}{Description}
from thepdfcomment
package, to define terms directly (without going through a glossary), but it behaves a bit strange. Probably pandoc needs some tweaking.Is this something that people would be interested in? Has anyone else already attempted it?
I would be happy to keep trying, if it makes sense.
Some related resources:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: