We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
VL-PLM and OV-DETR do use pseudo label but why ViLD is classified into "Require Novel Class"? ViLD only uses class agnostic proposals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
+1
Sorry, something went wrong.
OV-DETR indeed use pseudo labels, as you can find in the Section B of OV-DETR's Appendix and their implementations.
We follow the steps of ViLD, pre-training a detector with the base classes to predict object proposals that may cover the novel classes.
No branches or pull requests
VL-PLM and OV-DETR do use pseudo label
but why ViLD is classified into "Require Novel Class"? ViLD only uses class agnostic proposals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: