Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recognition on x32 #1838

Closed
qb1t0 opened this issue Aug 13, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Recognition on x32 #1838

qb1t0 opened this issue Aug 13, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@qb1t0
Copy link

qb1t0 commented Aug 13, 2018


Environment

  • Tesseract Version: 4.0.0-beta4
  • Platform: Ubuntu 16.04 x32

Current Behavior:

Bad text recognition on x32-bit server ;C

Expected Behavior:

Good recognition.

Suggested Fix:

Additional building flags ?

@stweil
Copy link
Member

stweil commented Aug 23, 2018

Support for x32 might indeed be interesting, because it should be significantly faster than 32 bit code and could even be slightly faster than 64 bit code because of better cache usage. I expect that it will require some work on the Tesseract code base to fix all portability issues. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X32_ABI and https://wiki.debian.org/X32Port for a few first hints.

@stweil
Copy link
Member

stweil commented Aug 24, 2018

@qb1t0, is the recognition on other installations better? Could you provide an example for the bad text recognition (image, command line, results)?

@stweil
Copy link
Member

stweil commented Aug 24, 2018

With the test image from tesseract-ocr/tessdata#108, I always get the same results for x32 and for x86_64 when I add --psm 6.

There is a difference when running Running tesseract test.tif -: x32 shows the well know assertion contains_unichar_id(unichar_id):Error:Assert failed:in file ../../src/ccutil/unicharset.h, line 509 with both Tesseract installations.

@Shreeshrii
Copy link
Collaborator

@zdenop Please label as Feature Request.

@stweil
Copy link
Member

stweil commented Sep 27, 2018

I think it can be closed, as x32 and x86_64 deliver the same results according to my tests.

@zdenop zdenop closed this as completed Sep 27, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants