-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update azurerm_orchestrated_virtual_machine_scale_set
- Add proximity placement group support
#7510
Update azurerm_orchestrated_virtual_machine_scale_set
- Add proximity placement group support
#7510
Conversation
…ment-group-support-for-orchestrated-VMSS
…ment-group-support-for-orchestrated-VMSS
…ment-group-support-for-orchestrated-VMSS
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this PR :)
Taking a look through this mostly LGTM - we just need to ensure there's a link to the issue tracking this RFC 2616 issue in the Azure API - if we can add this (and the tests pass) then this should otherwise be good to merge.
Thanks!
ForceNew: true, | ||
ValidateFunc: validate.ProximityPlacementGroupID, | ||
// the Compute/VM API is broken and returns the Resource Group name in UPPERCASE :shrug: | ||
DiffSuppressFunc: suppress.CaseDifference, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there an API bug tracking this so that the Compute API complies with RFC 2616?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I noticed this issue and checked the VMSS resources (they have a proximity_placement_group_id
atttribute too) and found this comment. As a result I just copied the comment here.
Specs repo does not have an issue tracking this now. I will open a new one and update the comment here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Issue created: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#10016
Hi @tombuildsstuff I opened an issue to track this issue, and added the link to the comment. Please have a look, thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @ArcturusZhang - LGTM
This has been released in version 2.19.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example: provider "azurerm" {
version = "~> 2.19.0"
}
# ... other configuration ... |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks! |
No description provided.