Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

User Assigned Identity: add corresponding data source #3343

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 7, 2019

Conversation

logachev
Copy link
Contributor

  • Created data source for User Assigned Identity
  • Added relevant tests
  • Updated documentation

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the PR @logachev,

I've left some comments inline for overall this is looking pretty good 🙂

azurerm/data_source_user_assigned_identity.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_user_assigned_identity_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_user_assigned_identity_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_user_assigned_identity_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
azurerm/data_source_user_assigned_identity_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/d/user_assigned_identity.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
website/docs/d/user_assigned_identity.html.markdown Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
})
}

func testEqualResourceAttr(dataSourceName string, resourceName string, attrName string) resource.TestCheckFunc {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I noticed that in other data source tests there is no any checks that data source resource contains same information as a resource.
Do you think this is valuable to move this function to some shared place and reuse in other data source tests?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is definitely value and a place for that: helpers/tf/acctest.go package would be perfect.

Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates @logachev,

This LGTM. Left one comment about where you could move that test helper. However i am going to merge this now so feel free to open a new PR with that change 🙂

})
}

func testEqualResourceAttr(dataSourceName string, resourceName string, attrName string) resource.TestCheckFunc {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is definitely value and a place for that: helpers/tf/acctest.go package would be perfect.

@katbyte katbyte merged commit 6ca4f35 into hashicorp:master May 7, 2019
katbyte added a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 17, 2019

This has been released in version 1.28.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
	version = "~> 1.28.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 7, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 [email protected]. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 7, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants