feat: Add unique tags to EBS block devices #327
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jebbens
changed the title
bryantbiggs
approved these changes
Apr 21, 2023
antonbabenko
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 21, 2023
## [4.5.0](v4.4.0...v4.5.0) (2023-04-21) ### Features * Add unique tags to EBS block devices ([#327](#327)) ([55ed759](55ed759))
|
This PR is included in version 4.5.0 🎉 |
|
I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Added
tagsto theebs_block_devicedynamic block.Motivation and Context
The change is not required, however it enables users to add unique tags per block device as opposed to just the general tags applied via
var.volume_tags.Breaking Changes
This does not break backwards compatibility - it is purely additive with no additional variables.
How Has This Been Tested?
examples/*to demonstrate and validate my change(s)examples/*projectspre-commit run -aon my pull requestUsed the docker version and all tests passed except the
Terraform wrapper with for_each in module. The linter changed the URL in the source lines, replacing every occurrence ofec2-instancewithlint, so I did not commit those changes.