You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue is not about bidders without name. It is about contracts for which bidders and sometimes even buyers are not disclosed as I explained in tenders-exposed/elvis-backend-node#61.
So, it's not that we have a bidder with id but no name, it's that we have no bidder records for a bid. We don't even know how many winners there were.
Currently these bids are accounted for only in the nodes we do have. For example, if the data only discloses the buyer, it will appear in the network as an isolated node because there is no bidder to link it to.
In a call yesterday another idea was proposed: to show the missing actors as grey nodes. So, if we have a bid for which we don't know the bidder in the network we show the buyer(s) normally and the bidder(s) as a single grey node, connected by a normal edge.
Network : https://tenders.exposed/network/303c8277-79c0-4bd2-a964-afa3d89e9c06/buyers/f4ddbdf8-1203-409e-a21d-bc98b1e37053
Shouldn't we make it lead to a fruit node?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: