Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Move SIMD to inactive proposals.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
ljharb committed Jun 20, 2017
1 parent 8d043f0 commit 35e0032
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ This list contains only stage 1 proposals and higher that have not yet been with

| 🚀 | Proposal | Champion | Stage |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-------|
| | [SIMD.JS - SIMD APIs](https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/) | John McCutchan, Peter Jensen, Dan Gohman, Daniel Ehrenberg | 3 |
| | [`Function.prototype.toString` revision](https://github.com/tc39/Function-prototype-toString-revision) | Michael Ficarra | 3 |
|   | [`global`](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-global)                                                       | Jordan Harband                     | 3 |
| | [Rest/Spread Properties](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-object-rest-spread) | Sebastian Markbage | 3 |
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions inactive-proposals.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ Inactive proposals are proposals that at one point were presented to the committ
| [Cancelable Promises](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises) | Domenic Denicola | Withdrawn |
| [Proposed Grammar change to ES Modules](https://github.com/bmeck/UnambiguousJavaScriptGrammar) | Bradley Farias | Rejected: No consensus on this specific solution.
| [Dynamic Module Reform](https://github.com/caridy/proposal-dynamic-modules) | Caridy Patiño | Withdrawn: we decided to preserve the current semantics
| [SIMD.JS - SIMD APIs](https://github.com/tc39/ecmascript_simd/) | John McCutchan, Peter Jensen, Dan Gohman, Daniel Ehrenberg | [Withdrawn](https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es8/2017-03/mar-21.md#conclusionresolution-10)



Expand Down

5 comments on commit 35e0032

@littledan
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, looks good to me.

@bterlson
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused by the discussion from the March meeting... is Withdrawn the right thing here (as opposed to demotion to state 1)?

@littledan
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be reasonable to put it under "inactive proposals" and note that it's at Stage 1 with the two caretaker champions mentioned at the last meeting?

@bterlson
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That does align better with what I understood the consensus to be...

@ljharb
Copy link
Member Author

@ljharb ljharb commented on 35e0032 Jun 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please sign in to comment.