Ready to resubmit for a TAG review?

[littledan]

WeakRefs were previously submitted for a TAG review. Since that time, the proposal has advanced significantly, both in its explainer and specification. Is it time for another TAG review, so we can give them a chance to complete the review before anyone feels pressure to ship the feature? cc @tschneidereit @gsathya

[littledan]

Note, we were encouraged to resubmit for review when things moved forward in w3ctag/design-reviews#321 (comment) .

[littledan]

Looking into this a bit more, I think we need several specification changes first. See the stage 3 blockers label.

[littledan]

At this point, I think we have strong answers for all of the Stage 3 blockers; formalizing some of the writeups is still in progress, but I'd say it's time to file for another TAG review. Any concerns?

[gsathya]

I think we can ask for another review once the three open PRs (#84), (#85), (#86) are closed.

Curious if TAG will have thoughts on #22

[littledan]

I think we should come to a conclusion on #22 and then present it to the TAG; that's how they are typically set up to work.

[littledan]

I've resubmitted this proposal to the TAG. w3ctag/design-reviews#321 (comment)

[littledan]

We've gotten some interesting review comments at w3ctag/design-reviews#321 .

[littledan]

We've made changes based on the TAG feedback, summarized at w3ctag/design-reviews#321 (comment), so I'm closing this issue.