Source phase terminology #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
sorry, can you clarify the term we're using now? I'm a bit confused.
|
lucacasonato
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM
@Jack-Works I'll explain at plenary - will update the readme after
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Renames the proposal to "Module Source Imports", using the terminology of this being a module phase as opposed to using the reflection term.
Syntax is updated from
import module x from 'x'toimport source x from 'x'using thephaseattribute for dynamic import.Cross-references are updated accordingly.