-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: gracefully handle recovering a duplicate output in LibWallet #3903
Merged
stringhandler
merged 7 commits into
tari-project:development
from
philipr-za:philip-double-import
Mar 25, 2022
Merged
feat: gracefully handle recovering a duplicate output in LibWallet #3903
stringhandler
merged 7 commits into
tari-project:development
from
philipr-za:philip-double-import
Mar 25, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SWvheerden
previously approved these changes
Mar 10, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
stringhandler
previously approved these changes
Mar 15, 2022
stringhandler
added
the
P-conflicts
Process - The PR has merge conflicts that need to be resolved
label
Mar 15, 2022
This PR addresses the issue of creating duplicate Faux transaction when an output that has previously been recovered is recovered again. This can happen during reorgs. It is a small fix to the code that when outputs are scanned to see if they can be rewound only new unique outputs are returned to the caller and duplicate outputs are ignored. The UTXO scanner will then only create new Faux transactions for the outputs that have not been previously recovered. Two Rust tests were added to confirm the correct behaviour in output scanning. This behaviour was already implemented for One-sided payments and a test existed that tested the ignoring of duplicates.
philipr-za
dismissed stale reviews from stringhandler and SWvheerden
via
March 23, 2022 11:01
bd189e0
philipr-za
force-pushed
the
philip-double-import
branch
from
March 23, 2022 11:01
504e4a1
to
bd189e0
Compare
@mikethetike conflicts sorted |
philipr-za
removed
the
P-conflicts
Process - The PR has merge conflicts that need to be resolved
label
Mar 23, 2022
stringhandler
approved these changes
Mar 25, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR addresses the issue of creating duplicate Faux transaction when an output that has previously been recovered is recovered again. This can happen during reorgs.
It is a small fix to the code that when outputs are scanned to see if they can be rewound only new unique outputs are returned to the caller and duplicate outputs are ignored.
The UTXO scanner will then only create new Faux transactions for the outputs that have not been previously recovered.
Two Rust tests were added to confirm the correct behaviour in output scanning.
This behaviour was already implemented for One-sided payments and a test existed that tested the ignoring of duplicates.
How Has This Been Tested?
Rust tests provided