-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding off one-sided transaction #3587
fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding off one-sided transaction #3587
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, makes sense
This isn't so much a consensus change as something that could make previously 'undiscovered' one-side funds not redeemable. Not a huge deal in testnet, so think this can go in
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ja this looks good and almost no one is using one-side transactions at the moment so the breaking impact is very small.
* development: feat: language detection for mnemonic seed words (tari-project#3590) chore: minor clippy fixes (tari-project#3576) fix: be more permissive of responses for the incorrect request_id (tari-project#3588) feat: track ping failures and disconnect (tari-project#3597) chore: upgrade tokio deps tari-project#3581 (tari-project#3595) feat: standardize output hash for unblinded output, transaction output and transaction input (tari-project#3592) fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding off one-sided transaction (tari-project#3587) refactor: update miningcore repository links (tari-project#3593) refactor: clean up unwraps in wallet_ffi (tari-project#3585) fix: update daily test start times and seed phrase (tari-project#3584) fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding in atomic swaps (tari-project#3586) v0.21.2 fix: remove delay from last request latency call
* development: (46 commits) refactor: remove tari_common dependency from tari_comms (tari-project#3580) feat: language detection for mnemonic seed words (tari-project#3590) chore: minor clippy fixes (tari-project#3576) fix: be more permissive of responses for the incorrect request_id (tari-project#3588) feat: track ping failures and disconnect (tari-project#3597) chore: upgrade tokio deps tari-project#3581 (tari-project#3595) feat: standardize output hash for unblinded output, transaction output and transaction input (tari-project#3592) fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding off one-sided transaction (tari-project#3587) refactor: update miningcore repository links (tari-project#3593) refactor: clean up unwraps in wallet_ffi (tari-project#3585) fix: update daily test start times and seed phrase (tari-project#3584) fix: allow bullet proof value only rewinding in atomic swaps (tari-project#3586) v0.21.2 feat: add atomic swap refund transaction handling (tari-project#3573) feat: improve wallet connectivity status for console wallet (tari-project#3577) v0.21.1 feat: add error codes to LibWallet for CipherSeed errors (tari-project#3578) ci: split cucumber job into two (tari-project#3583) feat(wallet): import utxo’s as EncumberedToBeReceived rather than Unspent (tari-project#3575) docs: rfc 0250_Covenants (tari-project#3574) ...
Description
This PR allows us to do bulletproof value-only rewinding on one-sided transactions.
Motivation and Context
Currently, it is not possible to do bulletproof rewinding on the value only on a one-sided transaction utxo due to the way the commitment blinding factor and bulletproof rewinding keys are created.
Currently, the two bulletproof rewinding keys are created as:
This means that if you share the rewind key, which is used to do value only rewinding, that a person can calculate the blinding key which is used to do full rewinding and expose the commitment blinding factor. by changing the calculation order we prevent this and only allow full rewinding by something who needs to be able to do this.
How Has This Been Tested?
All current test pass