-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: minor improvements to available neighbouring peer search #3598
fix: minor improvements to available neighbouring peer search #3598
Conversation
45a0cb4
to
434a984
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Logic LGTM - not tested
Going to work on various improvements to the strategy here, setting as draft |
434a984
to
ff90b86
Compare
c067fc6
to
fa598a5
Compare
fa598a5
to
5ab6083
Compare
5ab6083
to
4937112
Compare
* development: feat: bad block list for invalid blocks after sync (tari-project#3637)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, tested by starting to sync a node and seems good
* development: feat(consensus)!: add tari script byte size limit check to validation (tari-project#3640) fix: minor improvements to available neighbouring peer search (tari-project#3598) feat: bad block list for invalid blocks after sync (tari-project#3637)
Description
Motivation and Context
By removing peers from the peer manager when offline, the number of peers stored on the network should gradually decrease. This will only happen once all/most peers are upgraded.
How Has This Been Tested?
Memorynet
Manually, base node operates normally and peer list reduces (until peer sync pulls more in again from nodes without this change)