-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 247
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a "Test" Button for OIDC Configuration Validation on the Admin Page #3641
Comments
Problem DescriptionWhen configuring OIDC (OpenID Connect) for the first time in GoAlert, validating the configuration is currently a manual and time-consuming process. Users must set up the configuration, log out, and attempt to log in to see if it works. This can be tedious, especially when troubleshooting issues with the OIDC issuer URL or other setup details. Solution ProposalAdd a "Test" button next to the OIDC issuer URL input field on the admin configuration page. This button would allow administrators to quickly validate their OIDC settings, making the process more efficient and user-friendly. This button should perform basic checks, such as verifying the Key Features
Technical Implementation Steps
Possible Extensions
Benefits of the Solution
This "Test" button would streamline OIDC configuration, enhance usability, and make the integration setup much more efficient. |
What problem would you like to solve? Please describe:
Currently, when setting up OIDC integration for the first time, the only way to validate the configuration is to set it, log out (or open a new browser) and then test the login flow. This could be a tedious process especially when the configuration does not work as expected.
Describe the solution you'd like:
A "Test" button should be added next to the OIDC issuer URL input field on the admin config page. This button would promptly validate the entered URL, running basic checks (for example, verifying the payload of
.well-known/openid-configuration
). This feature should:Describe alternatives you've considered:
An alternative could be building an automatic configuration checker that runs these checks in the background every time a change is made, although this could potentially lead to unnecessary processing if the user is not ready for the check to occur.
Additional context:
Additional enhancements to consider to further improve the user experience:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: