Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve list of papers using TARDIS #1599

Open
isaacgsmith opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

Improve list of papers using TARDIS #1599

isaacgsmith opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@isaacgsmith
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Last year, we automated the process of generating references for papers that use tardis using this notebook. There are a few problems:

  • While the notebook automates the list, the notebook is not automatically run, and thus the list still needs to be manually updated by manually running the notebook (this is not as easy of a fix as it may seem, as the notebook requires a private key in order to be run).
  • The search criteria in the notebook returns extra papers that don't use TARDIS for any calculations, and also could potentially miss papers that use TARDIS for calculations.
  • https://tardis-sn.github.io/tardis/zreferences.html also contains a list of studies using TARDIS which is redundant (though that list only contains a fraction of the papers that the notebook generates). I will add that this list is in a more noticeable location within the documentation, so perhaps we may want to move the notebook-generated list to that location.

Describe the solution you'd like
Any solution that would fix any/all of the above bullet points would be phenomenal! I believe that this would be a good project for a first-time contributor.

@purna135
Copy link

Hi @smithis7 I am new to Open source and I would like to work on this issue

@jayantbhakar
Copy link
Member

is this issue still open?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants